Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8841 - 8850 of 66042 for motion to dismiss.

COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motions. On appeal, Fairconatue contends: (1) that the conviction must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37084 - 2009-07-06

[PDF] NOTICE
postconviction motion to modify his sentence. The Honorable William Sosnay decided Fairconatue’s second motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37084 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the settlement agreement. ¶8 The County filed a motion to dismiss the Neighbors’ complaint, asserting several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862953 - 2024-10-15

[PDF] Richard A. Eberle v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
) and 1986. The plaintiffs withdrew these claims in their Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17308 - 2017-09-21

Richard A. Eberle v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
motion to dismiss the claims added by the amended complaint or other issues raised by the pleadings. ¶12
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17308 - 2005-03-31

State v. Roger S. Walker
. This is a review of an unpublished court of appeals decision[1] dismissing Walker's appeal from his Green Lake
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25753 - 2006-06-29

[PDF] State v. Roger S. Walker
. This is a review of an unpublished court of appeals decision 1 dismissing Walker's appeal from his Green Lake
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25753 - 2017-09-21

2006 WI APP 189
and order dismissing Olivarez’ case was later signed on April 28. ¶7 Other motions relative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26321 - 2011-06-13

[PDF] NOTICE
of foreclosure and dismissal of Rohlf’s and Wilde’s counterclaims. The motion was supported by an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56791 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of foreclosure and the circuit court properly granted the motion for summary judgment. ¶11 Dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56791 - 2010-11-16