Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8851 - 8860 of 63351 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8851 - 8860 of 63351 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Charles W. Mark
probation as well as the rules of his supervision at trial. In response to the State’s motion in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6732 - 2005-05-09
probation as well as the rules of his supervision at trial. In response to the State’s motion in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6732 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
State v. Charles W. Mark
. In response to the State’s motion in limine, the court ruled that the evidence was not relevant, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6732 - 2017-09-20
. In response to the State’s motion in limine, the court ruled that the evidence was not relevant, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6732 - 2017-09-20
State v. John R. Jagusch
Jagusch appeals from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06[1] motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2099 - 2005-03-31
Jagusch appeals from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06[1] motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2099 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
Norman appeals a judgment of conviction. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134027 - 2015-01-27
Norman appeals a judgment of conviction. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134027 - 2015-01-27
[PDF]
State v. John R. Jagusch
WIS. STAT. § 974.061 motion for postconviction relief. Jagusch argues that (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2099 - 2017-09-19
WIS. STAT. § 974.061 motion for postconviction relief. Jagusch argues that (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2099 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
challenges the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. We reject Cobbs’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31510 - 2008-01-14
challenges the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. We reject Cobbs’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31510 - 2008-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the circuit court erred in denying his motions to exclude or suppress his blood test result. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532016 - 2022-06-15
that the circuit court erred in denying his motions to exclude or suppress his blood test result. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532016 - 2022-06-15
Frontsheet
. Subject to her biological parents' then joint custody arrangement, Amber spent those weekends
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51839 - 2010-07-07
. Subject to her biological parents' then joint custody arrangement, Amber spent those weekends
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51839 - 2010-07-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred when it denied his motion to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing, and he seeks plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237654 - 2019-03-19
erred when it denied his motion to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing, and he seeks plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237654 - 2019-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
enticement. He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Rogers presents three arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106674 - 2014-01-13
enticement. He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Rogers presents three arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106674 - 2014-01-13