Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8861 - 8870 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8861 - 8870 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Mark Drew
the motion. Before this court, Drew argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10672 - 2017-09-20
the motion. Before this court, Drew argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10672 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jerod R. Scott
the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion. We disagree and affirm. No. 02-0210-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4867 - 2017-09-19
the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion. We disagree and affirm. No. 02-0210-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4867 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
presentencing motions for plea withdrawal at an April 5, 2013 hearing. No transcript of this proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113855 - 2014-06-09
presentencing motions for plea withdrawal at an April 5, 2013 hearing. No transcript of this proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113855 - 2014-06-09
State v. Mark Drew
” and was for an improper tactical purpose. The court denied the motion. Before this court, Drew argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10672 - 2005-03-31
” and was for an improper tactical purpose. The court denied the motion. Before this court, Drew argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10672 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and No. 2018AP400-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239492 - 2019-04-24
motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and No. 2018AP400-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239492 - 2019-04-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
from an order of the circuit court denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18)1 motion without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261684 - 2020-05-27
from an order of the circuit court denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18)1 motion without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261684 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postdisposition motion to vacate both default judgments. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241053 - 2019-05-22
postdisposition motion to vacate both default judgments. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241053 - 2019-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS
in the trial court on January 12, 2006, denying his postconviction motion for an in camera review of Kenosha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30575 - 2007-10-16
in the trial court on January 12, 2006, denying his postconviction motion for an in camera review of Kenosha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30575 - 2007-10-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 2006, denying his postconviction motion for an in camera review of Kenosha County Department of Human
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30575 - 2014-09-15
, 2006, denying his postconviction motion for an in camera review of Kenosha County Department of Human
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30575 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 98
of a firearm by a felon, both as a repeater. His challenge arises from the denial of a pretrial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36652 - 2011-11-14
of a firearm by a felon, both as a repeater. His challenge arises from the denial of a pretrial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36652 - 2011-11-14