Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8861 - 8870 of 29324 for er.
Search results 8861 - 8870 of 29324 for er.
Keric T. Dechant v. Monarch Life Insurance Company
totaling over $2.5 million. Below we primarily address Monarch's claim that the trial court erred in law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7707 - 2005-03-31
totaling over $2.5 million. Below we primarily address Monarch's claim that the trial court erred in law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7707 - 2005-03-31
Ronald A. Arthur v. William J. Keefe
Arthur cross-appeals contending that the circuit court erred by: (1) failing to enter judgment in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14365 - 2005-03-31
Arthur cross-appeals contending that the circuit court erred by: (1) failing to enter judgment in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14365 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
witness entitles him to a new trial; (2) the circuit court erred when it failed to provide a castle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654489 - 2023-05-09
witness entitles him to a new trial; (2) the circuit court erred when it failed to provide a castle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654489 - 2023-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Koepp asserts the circuit court erred when it found he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967607 - 2025-06-11
. Koepp asserts the circuit court erred when it found he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967607 - 2025-06-11
State v. Stanley Lee Felton
of the victim's additional guns; (2) whether the trial court erred in excluding Felton's “expert” witness; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9649 - 2005-03-31
of the victim's additional guns; (2) whether the trial court erred in excluding Felton's “expert” witness; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9649 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark A. Coleman
, Coleman contends that the court erred by: (1) failing to determine whether he waived counsel knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4307 - 2005-03-31
, Coleman contends that the court erred by: (1) failing to determine whether he waived counsel knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4307 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred when it refused to grant him relief on his claim that he did not knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102008 - 2017-09-21
erred when it refused to grant him relief on his claim that he did not knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102008 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 116
by a bailee and the securities fraud charges. Second, LaCount argues the court erred in allowing expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28507 - 2007-04-26
by a bailee and the securities fraud charges. Second, LaCount argues the court erred in allowing expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28507 - 2007-04-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the petition. Notably, the Town does not argue that the County erred in doing so. In light of the Town’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813756 - 2024-06-13
of the petition. Notably, the Town does not argue that the County erred in doing so. In light of the Town’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813756 - 2024-06-13
[PDF]
State v. George Owens
for postconviction relief. Owens argues: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting the victim’s preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14170 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. Owens argues: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting the victim’s preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14170 - 2014-09-15