Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8861 - 8870 of 75185 for public records.
Search results 8861 - 8870 of 75185 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the public defender. ¶7 The record does not support Hawk’s contention that the commissioner rigidly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29791 - 2007-07-23
to the public defender. ¶7 The record does not support Hawk’s contention that the commissioner rigidly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29791 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
Alma Bicknese, M.D. v. Thomas B. Sutula
and dismissed Bicknese’s claims, agreeing with Sutula that he was immune from personal liability as a public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2775 - 2017-09-19
and dismissed Bicknese’s claims, agreeing with Sutula that he was immune from personal liability as a public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2775 - 2017-09-19
Alma Bicknese, M.D. v. Thomas B. Sutula
as a public employee. Bicknese argues that Sutula was not entitled to immunity either because (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2775 - 2005-03-31
as a public employee. Bicknese argues that Sutula was not entitled to immunity either because (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2775 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnathan Britt
order permitting the impanelment of an anonymous jury. Because the record supports the court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8848 - 2005-03-31
order permitting the impanelment of an anonymous jury. Because the record supports the court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8848 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to pre-trial publicity. As explained below, we conclude that the record does not indicate any juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155586 - 2017-09-21
to pre-trial publicity. As explained below, we conclude that the record does not indicate any juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155586 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Johnathan Britt
. Because the record supports the court's determination that the jury needed the protection of anonymity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8848 - 2017-09-19
. Because the record supports the court's determination that the jury needed the protection of anonymity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8848 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a crime; (2) the seizure did not occur in a “public place”; (3) the trial court erroneously denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170702 - 2017-09-21
of a crime; (2) the seizure did not occur in a “public place”; (3) the trial court erroneously denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170702 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Supreme Court Pending Rules Petitions
No. Petitions Filed-Not Yet Scheduled For Public Hearing: Date Filed: Rule
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19626 - 2017-09-21
No. Petitions Filed-Not Yet Scheduled For Public Hearing: Date Filed: Rule
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19626 - 2017-09-21
Supreme Court Pending Rules Petitions
-Not Yet Scheduled For Public Hearing: Date Filed: 05-09 In the Matter of the Petition for Amendment
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21779 - 2006-03-12
-Not Yet Scheduled For Public Hearing: Date Filed: 05-09 In the Matter of the Petition for Amendment
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21779 - 2006-03-12
[PDF]
Supreme Court Pending Rules Petitions
No. Petitions Filed-Not Yet Scheduled For Public Hearing: Date Filed: 05-09 In the Matter of the Petition
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21198 - 2017-09-21
No. Petitions Filed-Not Yet Scheduled For Public Hearing: Date Filed: 05-09 In the Matter of the Petition
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21198 - 2017-09-21