Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8861 - 8870 of 12879 for se.
Search results 8861 - 8870 of 12879 for se.
COURT OF APPEALS
., pro se, appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court found Burkhart Construction Corporation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74297 - 2011-11-28
., pro se, appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court found Burkhart Construction Corporation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74297 - 2011-11-28
[PDF]
Dolores J. Rindahl v. Ralph G. Rindahl
is the attorney for [Dolores]; also indicates that [Ralph] appeared pro se. That judgment of divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10709 - 2017-09-20
is the attorney for [Dolores]; also indicates that [Ralph] appeared pro se. That judgment of divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10709 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Sulla, pro se, appeals a circuit court order that denied Sulla’s motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063985 - 2026-01-23
Sulla, pro se, appeals a circuit court order that denied Sulla’s motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063985 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
State v. David N. Burkhart
with the State that there appears to be no broad, per se rule of general application condemning all generic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16264 - 2017-09-21
with the State that there appears to be no broad, per se rule of general application condemning all generic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16264 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. During trial, Jackson, appearing pro se, cross-examined Masi. Jackson asked Masi whether it was true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33690 - 2008-08-12
. During trial, Jackson, appearing pro se, cross-examined Masi. Jackson asked Masi whether it was true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33690 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. Ramage, pro se, appeals from orders entered on May 10, 2011, that granted him 591 days of sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90409 - 2012-12-10
. Ramage, pro se, appeals from orders entered on May 10, 2011, that granted him 591 days of sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90409 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
se, appeals an order denying a motion to modify his child support obligation. Tossing moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981051 - 2025-08-07
se, appeals an order denying a motion to modify his child support obligation. Tossing moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981051 - 2025-08-07
[PDF]
State v. Louis M. Elizondo, Jr.
motion to withdraw so that Elizondo could bring this appeal pro se. See § 809.32, STATS. No. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12623 - 2017-09-21
motion to withdraw so that Elizondo could bring this appeal pro se. See § 809.32, STATS. No. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12623 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dale Vercauteren v. County of Oconto
is grounds for reversal. Id. at 308. However, spot zoning is not per se illegal. Id. It is reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2905 - 2017-09-19
is grounds for reversal. Id. at 308. However, spot zoning is not per se illegal. Id. It is reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2905 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). James E. Curtis, pro se, appeals a circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622140 - 2023-02-15
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). James E. Curtis, pro se, appeals a circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622140 - 2023-02-15