Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8871 - 8880 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8871 - 8880 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Cynthia M.
, may raise by motion in the trial court any concerns she has about the performance of the GAL. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13977 - 2005-03-31
, may raise by motion in the trial court any concerns she has about the performance of the GAL. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13977 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
her motion for posttermination relief.2 Upon review of the record, it is our measured opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34569 - 2014-09-15
her motion for posttermination relief.2 Upon review of the record, it is our measured opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34569 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and Dorraj, and from the order denying her motion for posttermination relief.[2] Upon review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34569 - 2008-11-11
and Dorraj, and from the order denying her motion for posttermination relief.[2] Upon review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34569 - 2008-11-11
Emil E. Jankee v. Clark County
Jankee adequately while he was in the County's custody and control. They also pursued negligence claims
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17045 - 2005-03-31
Jankee adequately while he was in the County's custody and control. They also pursued negligence claims
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17045 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Emil E. Jankee v. Clark County
for negligently failing to supervise Jankee adequately while he was in the County's custody and control
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17045 - 2017-09-21
for negligently failing to supervise Jankee adequately while he was in the County's custody and control
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17045 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ted W. Urdahl
of Wis. Stat. § 346.04(3). He appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
of Wis. Stat. § 346.04(3). He appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
[PDF]
State v. Ted W. Urdahl
. § 346.04(3). He appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for dismissal of the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21
. § 346.04(3). He appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for dismissal of the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark Drew
” and was for an improper tactical purpose. The court denied the motion. Before this court, Drew argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10672 - 2005-03-31
” and was for an improper tactical purpose. The court denied the motion. Before this court, Drew argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10672 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
presentencing motions for plea withdrawal at an April 5, 2013 hearing. No transcript of this proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113855 - 2014-06-09
presentencing motions for plea withdrawal at an April 5, 2013 hearing. No transcript of this proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113855 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
State v. Jerod R. Scott
the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion. We disagree and affirm. No. 02-0210-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4867 - 2017-09-19
the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion. We disagree and affirm. No. 02-0210-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4867 - 2017-09-19