Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8871 - 8880 of 69007 for had.
Search results 8871 - 8880 of 69007 for had.
Wood County Department of Health and Family Services v. Terry L. R.
by the court, but he does not object to the answer to the second question. The jury concluded that Terry had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2676 - 2005-03-31
by the court, but he does not object to the answer to the second question. The jury concluded that Terry had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2676 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Avco Financial Services v. Susanne Musgrove
, Susanne, of which Musgrove had no notice; and Musgrove claims Avco’s complaint in that action should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15164 - 2017-09-21
, Susanne, of which Musgrove had no notice; and Musgrove claims Avco’s complaint in that action should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15164 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2023AP1298-CR 3 asked dispatch to call the telephone number that it had on file for Dopp. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=942615 - 2025-04-17
. No. 2023AP1298-CR 3 asked dispatch to call the telephone number that it had on file for Dopp. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=942615 - 2025-04-17
State v. Glenn R. Reetz
was illegal.[3] He argued, in essence, that the officers had unlawfully entered the home to effectuate his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
was illegal.[3] He argued, in essence, that the officers had unlawfully entered the home to effectuate his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Pleasant Prairie v. Maureen M. McCarragher
. Because we conclude that the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop McCarragher’s vehicle, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5989 - 2017-09-19
. Because we conclude that the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop McCarragher’s vehicle, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5989 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
had committed with Keys that same month.4 ¶6 The parties stipulated to additional DNA testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003792 - 2025-09-03
had committed with Keys that same month.4 ¶6 The parties stipulated to additional DNA testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003792 - 2025-09-03
COURT OF APPEALS
, reasoning the sentencing court had not actually relied on the erroneous information.[1] Williams now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107984 - 2014-02-10
, reasoning the sentencing court had not actually relied on the erroneous information.[1] Williams now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107984 - 2014-02-10
[PDF]
Sheboygan County v. Andrew C.H.
at the extension hearing. Although Cahill was not then treating Andrew, he had known Andrew for approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16130 - 2017-09-21
at the extension hearing. Although Cahill was not then treating Andrew, he had known Andrew for approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16130 - 2017-09-21
Urlene Lilly v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
decision, determining that Lilly had failed to provide financial information to the county in a timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8906 - 2005-03-31
decision, determining that Lilly had failed to provide financial information to the county in a timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8906 - 2005-03-31
Village of Oregon v. Bradley W. Ancelet
you do after reading the Informing the Accused form to Mr. Ancelet? A: We had to complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5542 - 2005-03-31
you do after reading the Informing the Accused form to Mr. Ancelet? A: We had to complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5542 - 2005-03-31