Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8871 - 8880 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 8871 - 8880 of 83389 for simple case search.
State v. Michael S. Czarnecki
of the search or seizure in light of the facts and circumstances of the case.” Bies, 76 Wis.2d at 468, 251 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16247 - 2005-03-31
of the search or seizure in light of the facts and circumstances of the case.” Bies, 76 Wis.2d at 468, 251 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16247 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marshall Jones
the initial stop was not valid, the police search of his pockets was overreaching, and his initial detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26365 - 2006-09-05
the initial stop was not valid, the police search of his pockets was overreaching, and his initial detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26365 - 2006-09-05
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Czarnecki
). The question of whether a search or seizure passes statutory or constitutional muster is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16247 - 2017-09-21
). The question of whether a search or seizure passes statutory or constitutional muster is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16247 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of certain documents related to the conviction: 1) Certified copy(s) of all search warrants. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27304 - 2006-12-04
of certain documents related to the conviction: 1) Certified copy(s) of all search warrants. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27304 - 2006-12-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the instant case threaten to impose criminal penalties on Sparby-Duncan for violating the IID order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058517 - 2026-01-06
in the instant case threaten to impose criminal penalties on Sparby-Duncan for violating the IID order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058517 - 2026-01-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial court’s grant of a second trial, and remand this case for an entry of judgment for Eastman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28962 - 2014-09-15
the trial court’s grant of a second trial, and remand this case for an entry of judgment for Eastman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28962 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
trial, and remand this case for an entry of judgment for Eastman in accordance with the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28962 - 2007-06-26
trial, and remand this case for an entry of judgment for Eastman in accordance with the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28962 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2023-24). ¶15 Baacke contends that she never argued in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971385 - 2025-06-17
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2023-24). ¶15 Baacke contends that she never argued in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971385 - 2025-06-17
[PDF]
Rosella F. Doll v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cas. Co., 117 Wis.2d 187, 196, 344 N.W.2d 108, 113 (1984). In this case there is no question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13226 - 2017-09-21
Cas. Co., 117 Wis.2d 187, 196, 344 N.W.2d 108, 113 (1984). In this case there is no question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13226 - 2017-09-21
Rosella F. Doll v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
). In this case there is no question that the requirements of § 802.09(3), Stats., are satisfied: because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13226 - 2005-03-31
). In this case there is no question that the requirements of § 802.09(3), Stats., are satisfied: because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13226 - 2005-03-31