Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8881 - 8890 of 84418 for ninth judicial district.
Search results 8881 - 8890 of 84418 for ninth judicial district.
[PDF]
MuniView Newsletter October 2000
View A periodic publication of Municipal Judge Education, Office of Judicial Education, Wisconsin
/courts/municipal/muniview/oct00.pdf - 2009-11-16
View A periodic publication of Municipal Judge Education, Office of Judicial Education, Wisconsin
/courts/municipal/muniview/oct00.pdf - 2009-11-16
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 12-01 - Communication to the Wisconsin Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules Procedures
. On June 3, 2013, Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson filed an amendment to the pending judicial
/supreme/docs/1201lettertocommittee.pdf - 2013-09-24
. On June 3, 2013, Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson filed an amendment to the pending judicial
/supreme/docs/1201lettertocommittee.pdf - 2013-09-24
[PDF]
Amended rules petition 08-05
perform limited judicial or quasi-judicial duties under the direction of the chief judge and the judges
/supreme/docs/0805petitionamend.pdf - 2010-01-20
perform limited judicial or quasi-judicial duties under the direction of the chief judge and the judges
/supreme/docs/0805petitionamend.pdf - 2010-01-20
[PDF]
Oral Argument Procedures
notify all counsel, the Clerk’s office, the Marshal, and the Chief Justice’s judicial assistant
/courts/committees/docs/oralargumentguide.pdf - 2025-09-26
notify all counsel, the Clerk’s office, the Marshal, and the Chief Justice’s judicial assistant
/courts/committees/docs/oralargumentguide.pdf - 2025-09-26
[PDF]
Updated: July 10, 2008
creation of rules for recusal when a party or lawyer in a case made contribution effecting a judicial
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33382 - 2014-09-15
creation of rules for recusal when a party or lawyer in a case made contribution effecting a judicial
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33382 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
96-03 SCR Chapter 62-Standards of Courtesy and Decorum for the Courts of Wisconsin
_________________________________________________________________ The court held a public hearing April 16, 1996 on the petition of the Executive Committee of the Judicial
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047 - 2017-09-20
_________________________________________________________________ The court held a public hearing April 16, 1996 on the petition of the Executive Committee of the Judicial
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
96-03 SCR Chapter 62-Standards of Courtesy and Decorum for the Courts of Wisconsin
_________________________________________________________________ The court held a public hearing April 16, 1996 on the petition of the Executive Committee of the Judicial
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047 - 2017-09-20
_________________________________________________________________ The court held a public hearing April 16, 1996 on the petition of the Executive Committee of the Judicial
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI 129
entered in a judicial review of an administrative decision, the appendix shall also contain
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30756 - 2014-09-15
entered in a judicial review of an administrative decision, the appendix shall also contain
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30756 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
96-03 SCR Chapter 62-Standards of Courtesy and Decorum for the Courts of Wisconsin
_________________________________________________________________ The court held a public hearing April 16, 1996 on the petition of the Executive Committee of the Judicial
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1219 - 2017-09-19
_________________________________________________________________ The court held a public hearing April 16, 1996 on the petition of the Executive Committee of the Judicial
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1219 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
court declared that it could judicially abrogate that which it had originally conceived. Id. at 39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8021 - 2017-09-19
court declared that it could judicially abrogate that which it had originally conceived. Id. at 39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8021 - 2017-09-19