Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8891 - 8900 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.

State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
the judgments of conviction, and from the circuit court’s orders denying his motions to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Committee and the Board held a joint meeting to address the application. Beverly Materials presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31320 - 2007-12-26

[PDF] NOTICE
2004, the P&Z Committee and the Board held a joint meeting to address the application. Beverly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31320 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] GF-223 Power of Attorney Delegating Parental Power (§48.979, Wis. Stats.) Hmong
attorney is for the purpose of providing for the care and custody of: Daim Ntawv Muab Hwj Chim (Power of
/formdisplay/GF-223_hmn.pdf?formNumber=GF-223&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=hmn - 2026-02-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
adjudicated father, Steven Coons. 2 Lori and Steven have both filed multiple motions since 2006 to modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179778 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Micheal Locklear v. Jon Litscher
in custody. Locklear submitted a traverse to the return, containing copies of documents related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5213 - 2017-09-19

Annette B. Brudnowski v. John M. Brudnowski
the formula for shared-time custody arrangements set forth in Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.04(2), Brudnowski owed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11971 - 2005-03-31

John L. Dye, Jr. v. WRC Program Review Committee
recommends maximum custody with transfer to WCI or any maximum institution for continued behavior monitoring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6759 - 2005-03-31

Micheal Locklear v. Jon Litscher
of the record pertaining to the charges for which the department believed Locklear was currently in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5213 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, custody, or control, but was instead in the possession, custody, and control of a witness who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263130 - 2020-06-04