Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8891 - 8900 of 17242 for probate/1000.
Search results 8891 - 8900 of 17242 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that newly discovered evidence entitles a probation revokee to an evidentiary hearing to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102207 - 2017-09-21
that newly discovered evidence entitles a probation revokee to an evidentiary hearing to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102207 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Taylor-Raymond’s no contest pleas. After determining that probation and a fine were appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110863 - 2017-09-21
of Taylor-Raymond’s no contest pleas. After determining that probation and a fine were appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110863 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
by twelve years’ extended supervision on three counts followed by ten years’ probation with a withheld
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137860 - 2015-03-24
by twelve years’ extended supervision on three counts followed by ten years’ probation with a withheld
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137860 - 2015-03-24
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 687 (1972), Doll contends that he should have received probation or a stayed sentence unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33034 - 2008-06-16
N.W.2d 687 (1972), Doll contends that he should have received probation or a stayed sentence unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33034 - 2008-06-16
State v. Ernest K. Knox
on a probation officer's recommendation, even though he technically complied with bargain; State v. Witte, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12179 - 2005-03-31
on a probation officer's recommendation, even though he technically complied with bargain; State v. Witte, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12179 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
representative of the estate. Because the estate was never probated, and because Schmidt was not appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35528 - 2009-02-11
representative of the estate. Because the estate was never probated, and because Schmidt was not appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35528 - 2009-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and it placed Melsness on probation for thirty-six months, with twelve months in jail as a condition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786865 - 2024-04-09
, and it placed Melsness on probation for thirty-six months, with twelve months in jail as a condition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786865 - 2024-04-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision to be stayed for three years’ probation. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18
’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision to be stayed for three years’ probation. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. O.
was reduced from forty to seven years. In addition, the State agreed to recommend probation and agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14913 - 2017-09-21
was reduced from forty to seven years. In addition, the State agreed to recommend probation and agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14913 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, and twenty years’ probation on the other two convictions. Kostroski filed a postconviction motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34815 - 2008-12-08
, and twenty years’ probation on the other two convictions. Kostroski filed a postconviction motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34815 - 2008-12-08