Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8891 - 8900 of 63956 for records.

State v. Idella Arrington
the record. We conclude that the no merit report correctly describes and analyzes the issues it identifies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9144 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jonathan P. Cole
with a judge.” Section 968.04(1)(a), STATS. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey S. Amerson
a matter in which a record was 1 Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12081 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 (2021-22).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708334 - 2023-10-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542879 - 2022-07-13

State v. Lee D. Worby
, the court noted that based on Worby’s prior record and other matters considered at sentencing, it could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2917 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald L. Tappa
prior record to the exclusion of other factors; and (2) the sentence was excessive. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4883 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James Gruentzel
of those standards, demonstrating the exercise of discretion, must be set forth on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6934 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude there is no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218718 - 2018-09-04

[PDF] State v. Travis E. Blanks
by Blanks independently. His appendix contains documents not of record and not at all related to this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9874 - 2017-09-19