Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 891 - 900 of 45231 for Cost-effective.
Search results 891 - 900 of 45231 for Cost-effective.
David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
order assessing costs against them in connection with their motion to dismiss the punitive damages claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14759 - 2005-03-31
order assessing costs against them in connection with their motion to dismiss the punitive damages claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14759 - 2005-03-31
David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
order assessing costs against them in connection with their motion to dismiss the punitive damages claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14726 - 2005-03-31
order assessing costs against them in connection with their motion to dismiss the punitive damages claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14726 - 2005-03-31
Thomas Calaway v. Brown County
expert to testify. The County cross-appeals, arguing (1) it is entitled to costs and disbursements; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9566 - 2005-03-31
expert to testify. The County cross-appeals, arguing (1) it is entitled to costs and disbursements; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9566 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
for the sum, or property, or to the effect therein specified, with costs. … If the offer of settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14759 - 2017-09-21
for the sum, or property, or to the effect therein specified, with costs. … If the offer of settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14759 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas Calaway v. Brown County
expert to testify. The County cross-appeals, arguing (1) it is entitled to costs and disbursements; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9566 - 2017-09-19
expert to testify. The County cross-appeals, arguing (1) it is entitled to costs and disbursements; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9566 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction that even though he committed his misdemeanors in August 2014, after the effective date
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192378 - 2017-09-21
postconviction that even though he committed his misdemeanors in August 2014, after the effective date
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192378 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and reverse and remand for the circuit court to determine and award reasonable costs and attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36472 - 2014-09-15
and reverse and remand for the circuit court to determine and award reasonable costs and attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36472 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the awards. We agree and reverse and remand for the circuit court to determine and award reasonable costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36472 - 2009-05-11
of the awards. We agree and reverse and remand for the circuit court to determine and award reasonable costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36472 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the courts erred in the treatment of development costs related to the Nordstrom store. It makes various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913146 - 2025-02-11
that the courts erred in the treatment of development costs related to the Nordstrom store. It makes various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913146 - 2025-02-11
Scott R. Meyer v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Co.
of the “reasonable cost of collection” under § 102.29(1).[2] Michigan Mutual claims that the circuit court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14837 - 2005-03-31
of the “reasonable cost of collection” under § 102.29(1).[2] Michigan Mutual claims that the circuit court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14837 - 2005-03-31