Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 891 - 900 of 83456 for case code.
Search results 891 - 900 of 83456 for case code.
Lake Bluff Housing Partners v. City of South Milwaukee
to conform to code by the time the case was heard on April 29, 1994. The trial court found that "Lake
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16911 - 2005-03-31
to conform to code by the time the case was heard on April 29, 1994. The trial court found that "Lake
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lake Bluff Housing Partners v. City of South Milwaukee
a building permit to Lake Bluff Housing Partners (Lake Bluff). This case presents the following issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16911 - 2017-09-21
a building permit to Lake Bluff Housing Partners (Lake Bluff). This case presents the following issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16911 - 2017-09-21
01-05 Amendment of SCR Ch. 60 - Code of Judicial Conduct, Appendix A(4) (Petition withdrawn)
of Supreme Court Rules: SCR Chapter 60 – Code of Judicial Conduct –Appendix A(4) FILED JAN 8, 2002
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1139 - 2005-03-31
of Supreme Court Rules: SCR Chapter 60 – Code of Judicial Conduct –Appendix A(4) FILED JAN 8, 2002
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1139 - 2005-03-31
01-05 Amendment of SCR Ch. 60 - Code of Judicial Conduct, Appendix A(4) (Petition withdrawn)
of Supreme Court Rules: SCR Chapter 60 – Code of Judicial Conduct –Appendix A(4) FILED JAN 8, 2002
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=967 - 2005-03-31
of Supreme Court Rules: SCR Chapter 60 – Code of Judicial Conduct –Appendix A(4) FILED JAN 8, 2002
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=967 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
01-05 Amendment of SCR Ch. 60 - Code of Judicial Conduct, Appendix A(4) (Petition withdrawn)
of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR Chapter 60 – Code of Judicial Conduct –Appendix A(4
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967 - 2017-09-20
of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR Chapter 60 – Code of Judicial Conduct –Appendix A(4
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
01-05 Amendment of SCR Ch. 60 - Code of Judicial Conduct, Appendix A(4) (Petition withdrawn)
of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR Chapter 60 – Code of Judicial Conduct –Appendix A(4
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1139 - 2017-09-19
of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR Chapter 60 – Code of Judicial Conduct –Appendix A(4
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1139 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
01-05 Amendment of SCR Ch. 60 - Code of Judicial Conduct, Appendix A(4) (Petition withdrawn)
of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR Chapter 60 – Code of Judicial Conduct –Appendix A(4
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967 - 2017-09-20
of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR Chapter 60 – Code of Judicial Conduct –Appendix A(4
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Lopez received a conduct report alleging he violated WIS. ADMIN. CODE §§ DOC 303.18, inciting a riot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70220 - 2014-09-15
, Lopez received a conduct report alleging he violated WIS. ADMIN. CODE §§ DOC 303.18, inciting a riot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70220 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Admin. Code §§ DOC 303.18, inciting a riot, and 303.20, group resistance and petitions. The conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70220 - 2011-08-24
. Admin. Code §§ DOC 303.18, inciting a riot, and 303.20, group resistance and petitions. The conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70220 - 2011-08-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the Wisconsin Administrative Code that regulate trade practices, but that Bikowski failed to prove that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426701 - 2021-09-16
and the Wisconsin Administrative Code that regulate trade practices, but that Bikowski failed to prove that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426701 - 2021-09-16