Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 891 - 900 of 1348 for shoe.

State v. Michael A. DeLain
, a golden rule argument asks the jurors to place themselves in the victim’s shoes. See Rodriguez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6469 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John F. Giminski
the circumstances existing at the time of the alleged offense”). ¶16 Even sliding inside Giminski’s shoes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3257 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Rsidue, LLC v. Michael R. Michaud
). In Michaud’s view, this provision means that an assignee “steps into the [creditor’s] shoes” for all purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25885 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
own shoes, dressing himself, using a zipper, or brushing his teeth. He also suffered from several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353512 - 2021-04-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“Nicara.” He then ordered her to dress, except for her shoes and socks, and made her walk barefoot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83035 - 2014-09-15

Michael Makarewicz v. Allstate Insurance Company
safety responsibility law. Makarewicz explains: [He] stands in nearly the exact same shoes as Donahue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15785 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Calvin L. Collier
). Certainly the playing field should be level when the shoe is on the other foot. The “manifest necessity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12980 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, who was in his socks, to put on shoes and come out to the garage with the other juveniles. Stroik
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
party in Fetzer’s shoes (and certainly a pro se party, as he was) would be entitled to rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761161 - 2024-02-08

COURT OF APPEALS
, stands in the shoes of the one from whom it was assigned the interest.” Accordingly, although SFG alone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108218 - 2014-02-19