Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8901 - 8910 of 12423 for mr.
Search results 8901 - 8910 of 12423 for mr.
State v. James E. Asbury
of court procedures and criminal law. The court found it “beyond comprehension that Mr. Asbury would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21696 - 2006-03-14
of court procedures and criminal law. The court found it “beyond comprehension that Mr. Asbury would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21696 - 2006-03-14
Delvin E. Bauer v. Century Surety Company
.’ Mr. Johnston’s activities up to the time of the accident included only interaction with the crane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24999 - 2006-06-27
.’ Mr. Johnston’s activities up to the time of the accident included only interaction with the crane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24999 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
State v.
: [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Mr. Buzaitis, you have testified several times in the past on this matter, have you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15514 - 2017-09-21
: [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Mr. Buzaitis, you have testified several times in the past on this matter, have you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15514 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and extended supervision. The prosecutor emphasized, however, “that Mr. Owens [wa]s the primary actor in terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28916 - 2007-06-26
and extended supervision. The prosecutor emphasized, however, “that Mr. Owens [wa]s the primary actor in terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28916 - 2007-06-26
State v. Jay A. Jansen
and applying the applicable law, this Court finds that Mr. Jay A. Jansen was entrapped by the Government
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8596 - 2005-03-31
and applying the applicable law, this Court finds that Mr. Jay A. Jansen was entrapped by the Government
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8596 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
offset of $24,000, due to a “fundamental change in Mr. Kordus’[s] duty to support” following the adoption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35478 - 2009-02-19
offset of $24,000, due to a “fundamental change in Mr. Kordus’[s] duty to support” following the adoption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35478 - 2009-02-19
State v. Kamau Kambui Bentley, Jr.
specifically recommended “that the Court set a parole eligibility date for Mr. Bentley at 45 years.” Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8391 - 2005-03-31
specifically recommended “that the Court set a parole eligibility date for Mr. Bentley at 45 years.” Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8391 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brady T. Terrill
plea form. Mr. Terrill, with respect to count one, if you as much as spit on a sidewalk, exceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2902 - 2005-03-31
plea form. Mr. Terrill, with respect to count one, if you as much as spit on a sidewalk, exceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Maurice S. Ewing
answered, “Absolutely not.” On rebuttal, the prosecutor asked Stetzer, “In fact, when you talked to Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19333 - 2017-09-21
answered, “Absolutely not.” On rebuttal, the prosecutor asked Stetzer, “In fact, when you talked to Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19333 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “the sole issue” in this appeal is “was there clear, convincing, and satisfactory evidence to find that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562677 - 2022-09-07
, “the sole issue” in this appeal is “was there clear, convincing, and satisfactory evidence to find that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562677 - 2022-09-07