Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8911 - 8920 of 46921 for show's.
Search results 8911 - 8920 of 46921 for show's.
State v. William Ray Toles
must show that counsel’s errors were serious enough to render the resulting conviction unreliable. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6843 - 2005-03-31
must show that counsel’s errors were serious enough to render the resulting conviction unreliable. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6843 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing, a defendant must either show that the plea colloquy was defective in a manner that resulted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208873 - 2018-02-23
sentencing, a defendant must either show that the plea colloquy was defective in a manner that resulted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208873 - 2018-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
). To establish deficient performance, Lewis must show that his counsel’s representation fell below an objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
). To establish deficient performance, Lewis must show that his counsel’s representation fell below an objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was an aggravating factor because it showed “intentionality.” Uitz argues that all burglaries by definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88170 - 2014-09-15
was an aggravating factor because it showed “intentionality.” Uitz argues that all burglaries by definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88170 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in this appeal. ¶8 In order to succeed on his claim of ineffective assistance, Adams must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39809 - 2009-08-19
in this appeal. ¶8 In order to succeed on his claim of ineffective assistance, Adams must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39809 - 2009-08-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Id. at 128. ¶6 To prove deficiency, a defendant must show that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50001 - 2010-05-17
that we review de novo. Id. at 128. ¶6 To prove deficiency, a defendant must show that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50001 - 2010-05-17
[PDF]
State v. Richard Stoeckel
stated “yes, yes, yes” when read the Informing the Accused, our review of the record shows that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5694 - 2017-09-19
stated “yes, yes, yes” when read the Informing the Accused, our review of the record shows that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5694 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gerold A. Haut
intended to kill. In addition, we determine there is no basis in this evidence to show Haut was provoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5046 - 2005-03-31
intended to kill. In addition, we determine there is no basis in this evidence to show Haut was provoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5046 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard Stoeckel
, yes, yes” when read the Informing the Accused, our review of the record shows that when directly asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5694 - 2005-03-31
, yes, yes” when read the Informing the Accused, our review of the record shows that when directly asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5694 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ben Breister v. Valley Bakers Coop Assn.
the burden to show: (1) they were an employee; (2) they sustained a compensable injury; (3) they applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6902 - 2017-09-20
the burden to show: (1) they were an employee; (2) they sustained a compensable injury; (3) they applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6902 - 2017-09-20