Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8911 - 8920 of 83718 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶3 This case arose from Jew’s conduct between January 12, 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269526 - 2020-07-14

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/archive.jsp?year=2009

[PDF] State v. David J.M.
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15

State v. David J.M.
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dwayne Williams
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Orville Oney v. Leroy Nennig, Jr.
with another Sheboygan County sheriff's detective and a probation officer, searched Oney's house pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8220 - 2017-09-19

Orville Oney v. Leroy Nennig, Jr.
, searched Oney's house pursuant to a search warrant. Various items were seized during the search. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8220 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey L. Meyers
to a crime, contrary to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, Stats. Meyers contends that the warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8910 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey L. Meyers
to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, STATS. Meyers contends that the warrantless search of the van he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8910 - 2017-09-19

Town of Monroe v. Bowmar Appraisal, Inc.
) (citation omitted). That is the case here. Bowmar’s arguments on appeal challenge the trial court’s legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3798 - 2005-03-31