Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8911 - 8920 of 58581 for speedy trial.
Search results 8911 - 8920 of 58581 for speedy trial.
State v. Christopher Walker
ineffective assistance of trial counsel; (2) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
ineffective assistance of trial counsel; (2) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lee A. Wofford
), Stats., and from an order denying postconviction relief. The issues are whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8882 - 2005-03-31
), Stats., and from an order denying postconviction relief. The issues are whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8882 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) his trial counsel was ineffective in numerous ways; and (3) the prosecutor and the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435213 - 2021-10-06
) his trial counsel was ineffective in numerous ways; and (3) the prosecutor and the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435213 - 2021-10-06
[PDF]
Kenneth C. Applegate v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
No. 99-2047 2 from an order denying his motion for a new trial or additur. His first claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15830 - 2017-09-21
No. 99-2047 2 from an order denying his motion for a new trial or additur. His first claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15830 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ronald J. Frank
argues that (1) the trial court erred when it ruled that other acts evidence would be admissible; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3944 - 2005-03-31
argues that (1) the trial court erred when it ruled that other acts evidence would be admissible; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3944 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered in 1992. He alleges that the trial court did not comply with allegedly applicable deadlines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98794 - 2014-09-15
entered in 1992. He alleges that the trial court did not comply with allegedly applicable deadlines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98794 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and punitive damages. Midwest No. 2008AP1241 2 argues the trial court erred by rejecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36243 - 2014-09-15
and punitive damages. Midwest No. 2008AP1241 2 argues the trial court erred by rejecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36243 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Rodney G. Zivcic
trial based on our supreme court’s decision in State v. Hansford, 219 Wis.2d 226, 580 N.W.2d 171 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13816 - 2014-09-15
trial based on our supreme court’s decision in State v. Hansford, 219 Wis.2d 226, 580 N.W.2d 171 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13816 - 2014-09-15
Alan J. Sapko v. Commercial Union Midwest Insurance Company
homeowner’s insurer, Commercial Union Midwest Insurance Company, following a jury trial. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2981 - 2005-03-31
homeowner’s insurer, Commercial Union Midwest Insurance Company, following a jury trial. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2981 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief.[1] He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122846 - 2014-09-30
his motion for postconviction relief.[1] He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122846 - 2014-09-30