Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8921 - 8930 of 50070 for our.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a number of factual findings, some of which we summarize in our discussion below. The court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232920 - 2019-01-17

CA Blank Order
not substitute our judgment for that of the jury unless the evidence, viewed most favorable to the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102330 - 2013-10-01

Timothy J. Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.
. ¶9 When reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3230 - 2005-03-31

State v. Trederick Nelson
Our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is to determine whether the evidence, viewed most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14804 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
as not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Our review of the record— including the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245611 - 2019-08-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 681. In doing so, “we give great deference to the trier-of-fact and do not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193119 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law independently of the commission. To support this proposition, it cites our decision in Michels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207571 - 2018-01-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the response, and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgments and order may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228321 - 2018-11-28

[PDF] State v. Reginald J. Humphrey
Humphrey's petition, determining that he continues to pose a significant risk to the community. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9873 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant by law enforcement officers. Id. ¶6 As our supreme court has outlined: The relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23