Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8921 - 8930 of 63956 for records.
Search results 8921 - 8930 of 63956 for records.
State v. Anthony Walker
, Walker moved the court to require DeMark to disclose his treatment records relating to substance abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11837 - 2005-03-31
, Walker moved the court to require DeMark to disclose his treatment records relating to substance abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11837 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
)(a), Stats. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date of arrest 12-14-87,” which is four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13217 - 2005-03-31
)(a), Stats. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date of arrest 12-14-87,” which is four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13217 - 2005-03-31
State v. April Dakins
is present. Cf. id.; Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 328.21(3). We conclude that the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10890 - 2005-03-31
is present. Cf. id.; Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 328.21(3). We conclude that the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10890 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert E. Christophel
is not in the record, Christophel entered his guilty pleas on November 23, 1999, and the transcript of that proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4156 - 2005-03-31
is not in the record, Christophel entered his guilty pleas on November 23, 1999, and the transcript of that proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4156 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are not in the record on appeal. See Fiumefreddo v. McLean, 174 Wis. 2d 10, 26- 27, 496 N.W.2d 226 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956841 - 2025-05-20
are not in the record on appeal. See Fiumefreddo v. McLean, 174 Wis. 2d 10, 26- 27, 496 N.W.2d 226 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956841 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-NM 2 but she has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562064 - 2022-09-07
-NM 2 but she has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562064 - 2022-09-07
State v. Travis E. Blanks
] Upon consideration of the report, Blanks' response and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
] Upon consideration of the report, Blanks' response and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
must show that the record contains an “unreasonable or unjustifiable basis” for the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70202 - 2011-08-24
must show that the record contains an “unreasonable or unjustifiable basis” for the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70202 - 2011-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the dispositional order may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218986 - 2018-09-12
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the dispositional order may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218986 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069321 - 2026-01-27
the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069321 - 2026-01-27