Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8941 - 8950 of 98542 for court records search online.
Search results 8941 - 8950 of 98542 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
not clarified its statements regarding misconduct in public office, it is clear from the record that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132030 - 2014-12-22
not clarified its statements regarding misconduct in public office, it is clear from the record that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132030 - 2014-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
the record. After a pause, the circuit court briefly went back on the record: THE COURT: Counsel, the clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75247 - 2011-12-14
the record. After a pause, the circuit court briefly went back on the record: THE COURT: Counsel, the clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75247 - 2011-12-14
COURT OF APPEALS
responded, “At this time the Court is going to enter a plea of not guilty on your behalf.” From the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41885 - 2009-10-06
responded, “At this time the Court is going to enter a plea of not guilty on your behalf.” From the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41885 - 2009-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a public records search. ¶17 At the conclusion of the hearing, the circuit court opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139848 - 2017-09-21
a public records search. ¶17 At the conclusion of the hearing, the circuit court opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139848 - 2017-09-21
Cynthia M. Stocking v. James Stocking
, or his search for the original of the agreement. The trial court explained that this testimony did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14236 - 2005-03-31
, or his search for the original of the agreement. The trial court explained that this testimony did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14236 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian A. Patterson
that the prosecutor, in his opening statement, violated the trial court’s ruling from the outset. The record, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5216 - 2005-03-31
that the prosecutor, in his opening statement, violated the trial court’s ruling from the outset. The record, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5216 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian A. Patterson
, having carefully reviewed the record, this court understands the basis on which the prosecutor sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5216 - 2017-09-19
, having carefully reviewed the record, this court understands the basis on which the prosecutor sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5216 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
court. The record demonstrates, however, that counsel did tell the court that White was no longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46365 - 2014-09-15
court. The record demonstrates, however, that counsel did tell the court that White was no longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46365 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
articulate a plea of no contest on the record in open court, because the only inference possible from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191380 - 2017-09-21
articulate a plea of no contest on the record in open court, because the only inference possible from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191380 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 17
and concluded that the dog sniff was not a search. Therefore, the circuit court did not need to explore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107211 - 2017-09-21
and concluded that the dog sniff was not a search. Therefore, the circuit court did not need to explore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107211 - 2017-09-21