Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8951 - 8960 of 30007 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] NOTICE
the court’s credibility determinations. ¶11 Finally, Ebert argues that the circuit court “ma[de] excuses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58745 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Ruth Woodring
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10581 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Karl Meyer
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10583 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. ¶7 In its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235606 - 2019-02-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. City of Madison v. Donohoo, 118 Wis. 2d 646, 651, 348 N.W.2d 170 (1984). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603258 - 2022-12-21

[PDF] County of Lafayette v. Bradley G. Heins
of reasonableness presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13562 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Darren Johnson-Hayes
of whether the statement was voluntary is an issue we review de novo. See State v. Franklin, 228 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15763 - 2017-09-21

State v. Adam S. Witczak
the constitutional standards mandated by the Fourth Amendment is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13428 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Guy S. Ruppenthal
can affirm a trial court’s ruling on grounds other than those employed by the trial court. See De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14215 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Richard T.
erroneous” standard in a termination-of-parental-rights case). We review de novo whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20792 - 2017-09-21