Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8951 - 8960 of 63198 for records.
Search results 8951 - 8960 of 63198 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218755 - 2018-09-12
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218755 - 2018-09-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
sought or that it had a positive and plain duty to disclose those records to him. Barnes appeals. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27304 - 2006-12-04
sought or that it had a positive and plain duty to disclose those records to him. Barnes appeals. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27304 - 2006-12-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261478 - 2020-05-21
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261478 - 2020-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139535 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139535 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210354 - 2018-03-27
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210354 - 2018-03-27
[PDF]
State v. Bradley K. Perkins
to modify a sentence on a motion brought under § 973.19, STATS. However, nothing in the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8829 - 2017-09-19
to modify a sentence on a motion brought under § 973.19, STATS. However, nothing in the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8829 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. The issue on appeal is whether the evidence supports the municipal court decision. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53981 - 2010-09-07
. The issue on appeal is whether the evidence supports the municipal court decision. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53981 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214501 - 2018-06-19
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214501 - 2018-06-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, the order is summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209957 - 2018-03-21
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, the order is summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209957 - 2018-03-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that on the current record a jury could only speculate as to whether the altered procedure, even if negligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30419 - 2007-10-03
that on the current record a jury could only speculate as to whether the altered procedure, even if negligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30419 - 2007-10-03