Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8951 - 8960 of 84321 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 8951 - 8960 of 84321 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98122 - 2014-09-15
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98122 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then obtained a search warrant to permit a trained dog to smell the area for drugs, leading to the eventual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248447 - 2019-10-15
then obtained a search warrant to permit a trained dog to smell the area for drugs, leading to the eventual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248447 - 2019-10-15
[PDF]
State v. Christopher V. Teague
a judgment of conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The only issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4594 - 2017-09-19
a judgment of conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The only issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4594 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher V. Teague
of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The only issue in this case is whether drug evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31
of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The only issue in this case is whether drug evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105544 - 2013-12-16
the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105544 - 2013-12-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and therefore has not triggered the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105544 - 2017-09-21
and therefore has not triggered the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105544 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donald Sherman
of the car and searched him. Buckley arrested Sherman after finding marijuana in his pockets. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15320 - 2005-03-31
of the car and searched him. Buckley arrested Sherman after finding marijuana in his pockets. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15320 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to suppress due to lack of probable cause and defects in the search warrant application process; (3) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305190 - 2020-11-18
to suppress due to lack of probable cause and defects in the search warrant application process; (3) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305190 - 2020-11-18
[PDF]
State v. Christopher T. Gile
law unconstitutionally penalized him for electing his right to refuse consent to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5632 - 2017-09-19
law unconstitutionally penalized him for electing his right to refuse consent to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5632 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher T. Gile
penalized him for electing his right to refuse consent to a search and seizure of his person. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5632 - 2005-03-31
penalized him for electing his right to refuse consent to a search and seizure of his person. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5632 - 2005-03-31