Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8961 - 8970 of 63485 for records.
Search results 8961 - 8970 of 63485 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326392 - 2021-01-27
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326392 - 2021-01-27
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
of his prior record, and his level of remorse. State v. Perez, 170 Wis.2d 130, 143, 487 N.W.2d 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19
of his prior record, and his level of remorse. State v. Perez, 170 Wis.2d 130, 143, 487 N.W.2d 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
of his prior record, and his level of remorse. State v. Perez, 170 Wis.2d 130, 143, 487 N.W.2d 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9606 - 2017-09-19
of his prior record, and his level of remorse. State v. Perez, 170 Wis.2d 130, 143, 487 N.W.2d 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9606 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138822 - 2015-03-30
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138822 - 2015-03-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report, the response, and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729785 - 2023-11-22
of the no-merit report, the response, and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729785 - 2023-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236949 - 2019-03-13
so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236949 - 2019-03-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052528 - 2025-12-23
report, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052528 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for transcripts. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196695 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his motion for transcripts. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196695 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218755 - 2018-09-12
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218755 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210354 - 2018-03-27
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210354 - 2018-03-27