Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 91190 for 1.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 91190 for 1.
COURT OF APPEALS
: rebecca f. dallet, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Brennan and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67302 - 2011-07-11
: rebecca f. dallet, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Brennan and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67302 - 2011-07-11
Jeffrey E. Marotz v. Arthur E. Hallman, Jr.
. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. Jeffrey Marotz appeals from a judgment declaring that Marotz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20747 - 2005-12-21
. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. Jeffrey Marotz appeals from a judgment declaring that Marotz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20747 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Lavell Deangelo Love appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144308 - 2017-09-21
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Lavell Deangelo Love appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144308 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ENGLISH, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2019AP2073 2 ¶1 REILLY, P.J.1 S.N.W. appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264683 - 2020-06-17
. ENGLISH, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2019AP2073 2 ¶1 REILLY, P.J.1 S.N.W. appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264683 - 2020-06-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
Higginbotham, P.J., Vergeront and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. John Haye appeals an order modifying his child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35448 - 2014-09-15
Higginbotham, P.J., Vergeront and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. John Haye appeals an order modifying his child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35448 - 2014-09-15
State v. Thomas F.
decided midway through the proceedings,[1] requires the State to allege and prove that the court is able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8717 - 2005-03-31
decided midway through the proceedings,[1] requires the State to allege and prove that the court is able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8717 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, P.J., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Julie Rhoades, pro se, appeals a February 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110488 - 2014-04-21
, P.J., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Julie Rhoades, pro se, appeals a February 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110488 - 2014-04-21
Rule Order
was posted on the court's rules website. The Committee also requested a July 1, 2016 effective date
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147853 - 2015-08-27
was posted on the court's rules website. The Committee also requested a July 1, 2016 effective date
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147853 - 2015-08-27
Rule Order
was posted on the court's rules website. The Committee also requested a July 1, 2016 effective date
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147867 - 2015-08-30
was posted on the court's rules website. The Committee also requested a July 1, 2016 effective date
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147867 - 2015-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Julie Rhoades, pro se, appeals a February 2013 postdivorce order modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110488 - 2017-09-21
2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Julie Rhoades, pro se, appeals a February 2013 postdivorce order modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110488 - 2017-09-21