Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 19106 for citi.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 19106 for citi.
Judith C. Dutchin v. Winston L. Dutchin
because it’s a pension and it must be treated as property. Those pensions, for instance, any City pension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6427 - 2005-03-31
because it’s a pension and it must be treated as property. Those pensions, for instance, any City pension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6427 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darryl Joe Brown
The Supreme Court cited Place in City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000), reinforcing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4666 - 2005-03-31
The Supreme Court cited Place in City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000), reinforcing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4666 - 2005-03-31
Yehuda Elmakias v. Michael Wayda
. In November 1995, Wayda notified the city building inspector that Elmakias was in violation of the city
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14769 - 2005-03-31
. In November 1995, Wayda notified the city building inspector that Elmakias was in violation of the city
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14769 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
failed. ¶9 City of Muskego tax assessor, Laura L. Mecha, testified that her department received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68884 - 2011-08-23
failed. ¶9 City of Muskego tax assessor, Laura L. Mecha, testified that her department received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68884 - 2011-08-23
City of Waupaca v. Mark D. Javorski
was submitted on the briefs of Kaye E. Anderson, assistant city attorney, of Waupaca, and James E. Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8913 - 2005-03-31
was submitted on the briefs of Kaye E. Anderson, assistant city attorney, of Waupaca, and James E. Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8913 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 145
) evaluate whether Securitas had a duty under the circumstances of this case, see Hocking v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40218 - 2009-10-27
) evaluate whether Securitas had a duty under the circumstances of this case, see Hocking v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40218 - 2009-10-27
[PDF]
State v. Timothy P. Zoellick
762). ¶10 Zoellick cites City of Oak Creek v. King, 148 Wis. 2d 532, 436 N.W.2d 285 (1989), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4325 - 2017-09-19
762). ¶10 Zoellick cites City of Oak Creek v. King, 148 Wis. 2d 532, 436 N.W.2d 285 (1989), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4325 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the circuit court. Mercer v. City of Fond du Lac, 2010 WI App 15, ¶8, 323 Wis. 2d 67, 780 N.W.2d 188 (2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226969 - 2018-11-13
as the circuit court. Mercer v. City of Fond du Lac, 2010 WI App 15, ¶8, 323 Wis. 2d 67, 780 N.W.2d 188 (2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226969 - 2018-11-13
[PDF]
Charter Northbrooke Behavioral Health System, Inc. v. Village of Brown Deer
of law.” State ex rel. Geipel v. City of Milwaukee, 68 Wis.2d 726, 732, 229 N.W.2d 585, 588 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14379 - 2014-09-15
of law.” State ex rel. Geipel v. City of Milwaukee, 68 Wis.2d 726, 732, 229 N.W.2d 585, 588 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14379 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
construction is that statutes are construed prospectively and not retroactively. City of Madison v. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31090 - 2014-09-15
construction is that statutes are construed prospectively and not retroactively. City of Madison v. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31090 - 2014-09-15