Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
on its face to entitle a defendant to an evidentiary hearing is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12
on its face to entitle a defendant to an evidentiary hearing is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfies the legal standards for ineffective assistance is a question of law we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244106 - 2019-07-23
satisfies the legal standards for ineffective assistance is a question of law we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244106 - 2019-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we consider de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
is a question of law that we consider de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
State v. Scott C. Harty
Whether Harty has demonstrated the existence of a “new factor” is a question of law which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15588 - 2005-03-31
Whether Harty has demonstrated the existence of a “new factor” is a question of law which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15588 - 2005-03-31
WI App 34 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP1158-CR Complete Title...
. Additionally, statutory interpretation presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Nelson, 2006 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137012 - 2015-04-28
. Additionally, statutory interpretation presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Nelson, 2006 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137012 - 2015-04-28
[PDF]
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. As noted, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12751 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. As noted, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12751 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See PNC Bank, N.A. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131638 - 2017-09-21
summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See PNC Bank, N.A. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131638 - 2017-09-21
State v. Elaine Veasley
are questions of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8636 - 2005-03-31
are questions of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8636 - 2005-03-31
County of Dunn v. Gerald J. Trainor
, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. ¶8 There is no question that a police officer may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3631 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. ¶8 There is no question that a police officer may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3631 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael H. Woeshnick
by the defendant. See § 968.03(1), Stats. The sufficiency of a complaint is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14862 - 2005-03-31
by the defendant. See § 968.03(1), Stats. The sufficiency of a complaint is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14862 - 2005-03-31