Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 63536 for records.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 63536 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph McGowan
. However, there are no facts of record here to support McGowan’s allegation that overcrowding caused his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5667 - 2017-09-19
. However, there are no facts of record here to support McGowan’s allegation that overcrowding caused his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5667 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. The issue on appeal is whether the evidence supports the municipal court decision. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53981 - 2010-09-07
. The issue on appeal is whether the evidence supports the municipal court decision. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53981 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052528 - 2025-12-23
report, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052528 - 2025-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS
“for the reasons stated on the record,” but there is no transcript of the hearing in the record on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118673 - 2014-07-30
“for the reasons stated on the record,” but there is no transcript of the hearing in the record on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118673 - 2014-07-30
State v. Torey U. Jennings
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12974 - 2005-03-31
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12974 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bradley K. Perkins
to modify a sentence on a motion brought under § 973.19, STATS. However, nothing in the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8829 - 2017-09-19
to modify a sentence on a motion brought under § 973.19, STATS. However, nothing in the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8829 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91741 - 2014-09-15
an independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91741 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045102 - 2025-12-04
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045102 - 2025-12-04
CA Blank Order
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108198 - 2014-02-16
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108198 - 2014-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2013AP1360-CRNM 2 of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125490 - 2017-09-21
2013AP1360-CRNM 2 of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125490 - 2017-09-21