Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8981 - 8990 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8981 - 8990 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
was not ineffective, and denied Luz O.’s motions for relief from the terminations. 4 WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.31(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7328 - 2017-09-20
was not ineffective, and denied Luz O.’s motions for relief from the terminations. 4 WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.31(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7328 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
Affolter to pay child support. A follow-up hearing was scheduled to discuss custody and alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64786 - 2011-05-23
Affolter to pay child support. A follow-up hearing was scheduled to discuss custody and alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64786 - 2011-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
custody and alternative physical placement, but Affolter failed to appear. Consequently, Affolter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64786 - 2014-09-15
custody and alternative physical placement, but Affolter failed to appear. Consequently, Affolter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64786 - 2014-09-15
Christine Simmons v. Richard Simmons
which provided in relevant part that both parties had custody and physical placement of the children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2636 - 2005-03-31
which provided in relevant part that both parties had custody and physical placement of the children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2636 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 239
to Giebel. In his statement of the case, Giebel relies heavily on the motion hearing transcript and we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26859 - 2006-11-20
to Giebel. In his statement of the case, Giebel relies heavily on the motion hearing transcript and we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26859 - 2006-11-20
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
was not ineffective, and denied Luz O.’s motions for relief from the terminations. 4 WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.31(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7329 - 2017-09-20
was not ineffective, and denied Luz O.’s motions for relief from the terminations. 4 WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.31(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7329 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the postconviction motion challenging the DNA surcharges. No. 2017AP806-CRNM 3 According
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210646 - 2018-04-02
the postconviction motion challenging the DNA surcharges. No. 2017AP806-CRNM 3 According
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210646 - 2018-04-02
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
was not ineffective, and denied Luz O.’s motions for relief from the terminations. 4 WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.31(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7327 - 2017-09-20
was not ineffective, and denied Luz O.’s motions for relief from the terminations. 4 WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.31(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7327 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion and request a Machner hearing. No. 2019AP1352-CRNM 4 To establish a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562359 - 2022-09-07
motion and request a Machner hearing. No. 2019AP1352-CRNM 4 To establish a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562359 - 2022-09-07
[PDF]
State v. Steven R. Olson
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PETERSON, J. Steven Olson appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4552 - 2017-09-20
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PETERSON, J. Steven Olson appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4552 - 2017-09-20