Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8991 - 9000 of 83366 for civil case no. "90-77".
Search results 8991 - 9000 of 83366 for civil case no. "90-77".
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084937 - 2026-03-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084937 - 2026-03-04
City of Racine v. Robert Robinson
in a civil forfeiture action. On appeal, Robinson argues that because he did not have notice of the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9113 - 2005-03-31
in a civil forfeiture action. On appeal, Robinson argues that because he did not have notice of the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084937 - 2026-03-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084937 - 2026-03-04
State v. Bobby Joe Smith
. Wisconsin trial courts "have original [subject matter] jurisdiction of all matters civil and criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8295 - 2005-03-31
. Wisconsin trial courts "have original [subject matter] jurisdiction of all matters civil and criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8295 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stanley E. Young
in the performance of his or her duty including the service of any summons or civil process. (b) “Officer” means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3355 - 2005-03-31
in the performance of his or her duty including the service of any summons or civil process. (b) “Officer” means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3355 - 2005-03-31
June Remick v. James D. Cady
are satisfied that the forms signed by the next of kin in this case were intended, and acted, simply to limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16332 - 2005-03-31
are satisfied that the forms signed by the next of kin in this case were intended, and acted, simply to limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16332 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dennis M. Makeeff v. Eau Claire County
it initially denied the motion. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. Because this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11830 - 2017-09-21
it initially denied the motion. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. Because this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11830 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Danny W. Tyler
. Suppressing the constitutionally obtained evidence in this case would frustrate the objectives of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6420 - 2017-09-19
. Suppressing the constitutionally obtained evidence in this case would frustrate the objectives of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6420 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael F. Hobart
possessed a controlled substance; (2) does an arrest for the civil offense of operating a snowmobile while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11736 - 2017-09-20
possessed a controlled substance; (2) does an arrest for the civil offense of operating a snowmobile while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11736 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
John Daggett v. Paul Getchel
appellants in a civil action are bound by the same rules that apply to attorneys on appeal and must satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8571 - 2017-09-19
appellants in a civil action are bound by the same rules that apply to attorneys on appeal and must satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8571 - 2017-09-19