Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 91 - 100 of 17366 for Cost.

[PDF] Tracy George v. Jon Litscher
a trial court order that denied him $188.98 in costs after he prevailed in his certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15131 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of Nieves’s request that the State be found in contempt and ordered to pay costs and attorney fees associated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80046 - 2012-03-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to consider the merits of Nieves’s request that the State be found in contempt and ordered to pay costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80046 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
No. 1999AP2862-D 2 him to pay the costs of prior disciplinary and reinstatement proceedings. ¶2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18712 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 56
) determined the amount of attorney fees to be awarded as reasonable costs of collection in a third-party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218465 - 2018-10-11

[PDF] WI APP 75
easement No. 2007AP1315 2 rights along a county highway and the costs of relocating its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32342 - 2014-09-15

Ronny Eaton v. City of New Berlin
and Deborah Eaton appeal from a judgment awarding $10,108 plus interest and costs to the City of New Berlin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6340 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ronny Eaton v. City of New Berlin
. Ronny and Deborah Eaton appeal from a judgment awarding $10,108 plus interest and costs to the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6340 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Susan Shoemaker v. KraftMaid Cabinetry, Inc.
to dismiss and the court’s judgment entered in favor of KraftMaid for costs. For the following reasons, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3510 - 2017-09-19

Susan Shoemaker v. KraftMaid Cabinetry, Inc.
judgment entered in favor of KraftMaid for costs. For the following reasons, we affirm. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3510 - 2005-03-31