Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 91 - 100 of 45080 for Cost-effective.
Search results 91 - 100 of 45080 for Cost-effective.
[PDF]
WI APP 52
priorities listed in WIS. STAT. § 1.12(4) to ratemaking “to the extent cost-effective, technically feasible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835405 - 2024-10-17
priorities listed in WIS. STAT. § 1.12(4) to ratemaking “to the extent cost-effective, technically feasible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835405 - 2024-10-17
Rules Hearing
to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 relating to Cost Assessments in the Lawyer Regulation System. FILED AUG 3
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52996 - 2010-08-02
to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 relating to Cost Assessments in the Lawyer Regulation System. FILED AUG 3
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52996 - 2010-08-02
[PDF]
2017 OWI Guidelines District 2
MUNICIPAL COURT OWI Sentencing Guidelines – Second District Effective July 14, 2015 Non
/publications/fees/docs/d2owi2017.pdf - 2017-03-02
MUNICIPAL COURT OWI Sentencing Guidelines – Second District Effective July 14, 2015 Non
/publications/fees/docs/d2owi2017.pdf - 2017-03-02
[PDF]
WI 107
it appropriate to require Attorney Gende to pay the full costs of the proceeding, which are $28,478.26
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87476 - 2014-09-15
it appropriate to require Attorney Gende to pay the full costs of the proceeding, which are $28,478.26
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87476 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) whether the joint settlement offer was effective for purposes of obtaining costs under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107486 - 2017-09-21
) whether the joint settlement offer was effective for purposes of obtaining costs under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107486 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was effective for purposes of obtaining costs under § 807.01(1). ¶31 Whether a settlement offer under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107486 - 2014-01-29
was effective for purposes of obtaining costs under § 807.01(1). ¶31 Whether a settlement offer under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107486 - 2014-01-29
Oneida County v. Sara J.W.
. However, the Act does not apply to this case because the cause of action arose prior to its effective date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10757 - 2005-03-31
. However, the Act does not apply to this case because the cause of action arose prior to its effective date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10757 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oneida County v. Sara J.W.
arose prior to its effective date. The order is affirmed. The facts are undisputed. Sara J. W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10757 - 2017-09-20
arose prior to its effective date. The order is affirmed. The facts are undisputed. Sara J. W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10757 - 2017-09-20
Daniel Steinbach v. Green Lake Sanitary District
and the District's recovery of "the capital cost to [it] to provide sanitary sewer service to individual lots
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25426 - 2006-06-05
and the District's recovery of "the capital cost to [it] to provide sanitary sewer service to individual lots
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25426 - 2006-06-05
[PDF]
Daniel Steinbach v. Green Lake Sanitary District
the Petitioners and the District's recovery of "the capital cost to [it] to provide sanitary sewer service
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25426 - 2017-09-21
the Petitioners and the District's recovery of "the capital cost to [it] to provide sanitary sewer service
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25426 - 2017-09-21