Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 91 - 100 of 82874 for simple case search.
Search results 91 - 100 of 82874 for simple case search.
State v. David Vigil
into the alley to search for the alleged puddle of urine. In the end, the search did not reveal a puddle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7435 - 2005-03-31
into the alley to search for the alleged puddle of urine. In the end, the search did not reveal a puddle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7435 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Blue used to deliver the cocaine was registered to a woman at the 22nd Street house. A search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76796 - 2014-09-15
Blue used to deliver the cocaine was registered to a woman at the 22nd Street house. A search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76796 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was registered to a woman at the 22nd Street house. A search warrant was obtained for that house. A traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76796 - 2012-01-23
was registered to a woman at the 22nd Street house. A search warrant was obtained for that house. A traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76796 - 2012-01-23
[PDF]
State v. Scott M. Doering
Amendment, which prevents unreasonable searches and seizures, applies to traffic stops because they have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6500 - 2017-09-19
Amendment, which prevents unreasonable searches and seizures, applies to traffic stops because they have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6500 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott M. Doering
). There is no simple test for determining the reasonableness of a search and seizure; rather, it is a balancing test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6500 - 2005-03-31
). There is no simple test for determining the reasonableness of a search and seizure; rather, it is a balancing test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6500 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William Staples
a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the search of the “utility case” and the search of his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2697 - 2017-09-19
a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the search of the “utility case” and the search of his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2697 - 2017-09-19
State v. William Staples
. In December 1999, Staples filed a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the search of the “utility case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2697 - 2005-03-31
. In December 1999, Staples filed a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the search of the “utility case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2697 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 14-01 - Response from the State of Wisconsin Department of Justice
because a search of her name on the Internet produced a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that identified
/supreme/docs/1401commentsdoj.pdf - 2014-09-03
because a search of her name on the Internet produced a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that identified
/supreme/docs/1401commentsdoj.pdf - 2014-09-03
State v. Patrick D. O'Donnell
of this charge, the jury rejected a lesser included offense of simple possession of marijuana. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14878 - 2005-03-31
of this charge, the jury rejected a lesser included offense of simple possession of marijuana. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14878 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick D. O'Donnell
, the jury rejected a lesser included offense of simple possession of marijuana. We reverse the portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14878 - 2017-09-21
, the jury rejected a lesser included offense of simple possession of marijuana. We reverse the portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14878 - 2017-09-21