Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9001 - 9010 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 9001 - 9010 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank
was in their physical custody. What Aguilar fails to understand is that two states may share concurrent jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27
was in their physical custody. What Aguilar fails to understand is that two states may share concurrent jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A. GONZALEZ, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, J.1 Shelly J. appeals an order denying her motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68709 - 2014-09-15
A. GONZALEZ, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, J.1 Shelly J. appeals an order denying her motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68709 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, with cocaine in his meconium.2 As a result, he was taken into protective custody and placed outside the home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97407 - 2014-09-15
, with cocaine in his meconium.2 As a result, he was taken into protective custody and placed outside the home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97407 - 2014-09-15
State v. Titus Graham
Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief.[1] His postconviction motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24635 - 2006-03-27
Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief.[1] His postconviction motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24635 - 2006-03-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
an expert witness not properly identified. The circuit court denied the motion to dismiss based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33689 - 2014-09-15
an expert witness not properly identified. The circuit court denied the motion to dismiss based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33689 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the underlying facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion and any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33689 - 2008-08-12
the underlying facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion and any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33689 - 2008-08-12
[PDF]
Pamela J. Kranski v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
, and $700 in medical expenses West Bend had paid her previously. ¶5 Kranski filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16095 - 2017-09-21
, and $700 in medical expenses West Bend had paid her previously. ¶5 Kranski filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16095 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rex E. Wollenberg
postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Wollenberg argues that he pled pursuant to a deferred prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6623 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Wollenberg argues that he pled pursuant to a deferred prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6623 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying a motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243054 - 2019-07-02
argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying a motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243054 - 2019-07-02
[PDF]
Oscar J. Boldt Construction Co. v. N.J. Schaub & Sons, Inc.
this motion, but required Boldt to pay Schaub certain costs as a condition precedent to Boldt refiling its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2456 - 2017-09-19
this motion, but required Boldt to pay Schaub certain costs as a condition precedent to Boldt refiling its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2456 - 2017-09-19