Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9001 - 9010 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 9001 - 9010 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
of September 30, 1999, it is correct that I did remove the old fence on my end of the joint line fence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84993 - 2012-07-18
of September 30, 1999, it is correct that I did remove the old fence on my end of the joint line fence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84993 - 2012-07-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A. GONZALEZ, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, J.1 Shelly J. appeals an order denying her motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68709 - 2014-09-15
A. GONZALEZ, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, J.1 Shelly J. appeals an order denying her motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68709 - 2014-09-15
State v. Titus Graham
Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief.[1] His postconviction motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24635 - 2006-03-27
Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief.[1] His postconviction motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24635 - 2006-03-27
State v. Pamela L. Peters
to obtain something of value, to wit "(1) not being taken into custody on warrants from other jurisdictions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16573 - 2005-03-31
to obtain something of value, to wit "(1) not being taken into custody on warrants from other jurisdictions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16573 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oscar J. Boldt Construction Co. v. N.J. Schaub & Sons, Inc.
this motion, but required Boldt to pay Schaub certain costs as a condition precedent to Boldt refiling its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2456 - 2017-09-19
this motion, but required Boldt to pay Schaub certain costs as a condition precedent to Boldt refiling its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2456 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to APPROVE the request. Richard Tuma seconded the motion. A vote was taken and carried unanimously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244245 - 2019-07-31
to APPROVE the request. Richard Tuma seconded the motion. A vote was taken and carried unanimously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244245 - 2019-07-31
Alice J. Heise v. Carl P. Heise
motions to clarify the court’s ruling.[4] The court explained: Maybe the problem is trying to sort out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7402 - 2005-03-31
motions to clarify the court’s ruling.[4] The court explained: Maybe the problem is trying to sort out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7402 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Alice J. Heise v. Carl P. Heise
the trial, the parties brought motions to clarify the court’s ruling.4 The court explained: Maybe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7402 - 2017-09-20
the trial, the parties brought motions to clarify the court’s ruling.4 The court explained: Maybe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7402 - 2017-09-20
Oscar J. Boldt Construction Co. v. N.J. Schaub & Sons, Inc.
this motion, but required Boldt to pay Schaub certain costs as a condition precedent to Boldt refiling its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2456 - 2005-03-31
this motion, but required Boldt to pay Schaub certain costs as a condition precedent to Boldt refiling its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2456 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denial of the grievance, the parties made a joint request, pursuant to the procedures set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82296 - 2012-05-09
denial of the grievance, the parties made a joint request, pursuant to the procedures set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82296 - 2012-05-09