Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9001 - 9010 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. As noted, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12751 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144334 - 2015-07-13

COURT OF APPEALS
. Id., ¶3. We review the issue de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶8 Here, Robert failed to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47143 - 2010-02-17

COURT OF APPEALS
was continued frivolously is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶11 On appeal, Scheunemann presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99529 - 2013-07-23

[PDF] Douglas County Department of Human Services v. Susan L.
that presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12882 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frank Nordstrom v. Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company
coverage exists. Wisconsin Mutual now appeals.2 We review summary judgments de novo. Universal Die
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11860 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Malcolm M. Mumm
a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 669. ¶5 Mumm relies on two federal cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3415 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Carlton S. C.-B.
rights were violated presents a question of “constitutional fact” reviewed de novo, see State v. Heft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9526 - 2017-09-19

Village of Avoca v. Gail Carr
is a question of law, which we review de novo. County of Adams v. Romeo, 191 Wis. 2d 379, 383, 528 N.W.2d 418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3232 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jarrell E. Hurley
). The existence of a new factor is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 210 Wis. 2d 196
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18691 - 2005-06-28