Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9011 - 9020 of 30108 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Mardelle E. Triggs
review is de novo. Id. ¶6 The video tape shows that Triggs made a number of comments and asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7534 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
-Naranjo presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99723 - 2013-07-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
reviewing the sufficiency of the complaint de novo, Kahn’s pleading falls far short. On appeal, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745135 - 2023-12-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Fonte, 281 Wis. 2d 654, ¶9. We will reverse a conviction and order a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961908 - 2025-05-28

SCR CHAPTER 71
be reviewed de novo; (b) Settlement conferences, pretrial conferences, and matters related
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45320 - 2011-01-02

[PDF] NOTICE
(2005–06),3 to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33273 - 2014-09-15

Micah Oriedo v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
. 1993). This appeal, therefore, presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Waste
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13154 - 2005-03-31

City of New London v. James E. Knaus
The construction of a stipulation is a question of law that we review de novo. See Cummings v. Klawitter, 179 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4809 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kenneth A. Albrecht
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9829 - 2017-09-19

Marino Construction Co., Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
statements made by their agent or employee is a question of law that we review de novo. See Snow v. Koeppl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7899 - 2005-03-31