Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9011 - 9020 of 68963 for did.
Search results 9011 - 9020 of 68963 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because it did not exist or was unknowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34511 - 2014-09-15
to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because it did not exist or was unknowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34511 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, explaining that it did not want another delay in the sentencing hearing, which had been pending since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68379 - 2014-09-15
, explaining that it did not want another delay in the sentencing hearing, which had been pending since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68379 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the hospital, and he became kind of loud although he was not threatening, but he became loud, and he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32347 - 2014-09-15
in the hospital, and he became kind of loud although he was not threatening, but he became loud, and he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James A. Beau
therein was true and correct. Although the client did not herself enter the date she had signed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16939 - 2017-09-21
therein was true and correct. Although the client did not herself enter the date she had signed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16939 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Because Adames did not raise any new issues in his motion for reconsideration, we lack jurisdiction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114229 - 2026-05-05
Because Adames did not raise any new issues in his motion for reconsideration, we lack jurisdiction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114229 - 2026-05-05
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
of discretionary reversal because the trial court did not allow him to explain probable cause to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9045 - 2017-09-19
of discretionary reversal because the trial court did not allow him to explain probable cause to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9045 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
it was discovered that Strociek had moved. It is undisputed that Strociek did not respond to the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32159 - 2014-09-15
it was discovered that Strociek had moved. It is undisputed that Strociek did not respond to the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Armond N. Henderson
reason for not raising the issues in the direct (no-merit) appeal, we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26419 - 2017-09-21
reason for not raising the issues in the direct (no-merit) appeal, we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26419 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by the hygiene lab was in fact Burkins’ blood. Counsel also noted the hygiene lab did not test the blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98334 - 2013-06-24
by the hygiene lab was in fact Burkins’ blood. Counsel also noted the hygiene lab did not test the blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98334 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
State v. Bobbie L. Wilson
his sentence. We conclude that Wilson did not demonstrate the existence of a new factor requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18677 - 2017-09-21
his sentence. We conclude that Wilson did not demonstrate the existence of a new factor requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18677 - 2017-09-21