Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9011 - 9020 of 68961 for he.
Search results 9011 - 9020 of 68961 for he.
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Charles Glynn
falsely indicating that he was reimbursing the estates for disbursements he had made to himself without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17542 - 2011-02-14
falsely indicating that he was reimbursing the estates for disbursements he had made to himself without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17542 - 2011-02-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a dangerous weapon and as a repeat offender. He also No. 2013AP891-CR 2 appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103683 - 2017-09-21
of a dangerous weapon and as a repeat offender. He also No. 2013AP891-CR 2 appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan V. Manke
to withdraw his plea or, alternatively, to be resentenced before a different judge. He argued that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14452 - 2017-09-21
to withdraw his plea or, alternatively, to be resentenced before a different judge. He argued that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14452 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion.1 He contends that (1) he was improperly charged; (2) he was denied the right to self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256051 - 2020-03-13
postconviction motion.1 He contends that (1) he was improperly charged; (2) he was denied the right to self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256051 - 2020-03-13
COURT OF APPEALS
that the pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he did not properly understand the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29244 - 2007-05-30
that the pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he did not properly understand the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29244 - 2007-05-30
State v. James F. Blasky
) and 939.647[1] (2001-02).[2] He claims the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6642 - 2005-03-31
) and 939.647[1] (2001-02).[2] He claims the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6642 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion. He argues that there was no proof that he possessed the firearms on the date stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45608 - 2014-09-15
motion. He argues that there was no proof that he possessed the firearms on the date stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45608 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ventae Parrow
, J.1 Ventae Parrow appeals from the judgments of conviction entered after he pled guilty to two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14987 - 2017-09-21
, J.1 Ventae Parrow appeals from the judgments of conviction entered after he pled guilty to two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14987 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2010AP723-CR 2 of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends that a sheriff’s deputy who was looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53254 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2010AP723-CR 2 of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends that a sheriff’s deputy who was looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53254 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was notified of his right to respond, but he has not done so. After reviewing the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195401 - 2017-09-21
was notified of his right to respond, but he has not done so. After reviewing the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195401 - 2017-09-21