Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9011 - 9020 of 20989 for word.
Search results 9011 - 9020 of 20989 for word.
State v. David J. Clark
for the second year spent by him in jail as a condition of probation. In its own words, “[t]he State recognizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4443 - 2005-03-31
for the second year spent by him in jail as a condition of probation. In its own words, “[t]he State recognizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4443 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
words, counsel had argued to the jury that Strupp was acting to protect himself. Strupp had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69082 - 2011-08-03
words, counsel had argued to the jury that Strupp was acting to protect himself. Strupp had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69082 - 2011-08-03
Irene Stussy v. North Crawford School District
in clearing the roadway. In other words, the only evidence that could suggest the Town knew about a hazard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15084 - 2005-03-31
in clearing the roadway. In other words, the only evidence that could suggest the Town knew about a hazard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15084 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence came into its possession. Moreover, Snyder says not one word about how late possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30618 - 2007-10-16
evidence came into its possession. Moreover, Snyder says not one word about how late possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30618 - 2007-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
?” The State, however, goes on to correctly assert that the court was not required to use “magic words
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995192 - 2025-08-12
?” The State, however, goes on to correctly assert that the court was not required to use “magic words
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995192 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
?” The State, however, goes on to correctly assert that the court was not required to use “magic words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995192 - 2025-08-12
?” The State, however, goes on to correctly assert that the court was not required to use “magic words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995192 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Dana E.
that the trial court must say the exact words—“unfitness is of such strength it undermines her ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4246 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court must say the exact words—“unfitness is of such strength it undermines her ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4246 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Dana E.
that the trial court must say the exact words—“unfitness is of such strength it undermines her ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4247 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court must say the exact words—“unfitness is of such strength it undermines her ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4247 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Howard R. Bolduc v. James Albert
the last word. See Ekstrom v. State, 45 Wis.2d 218, 223-24, 172 N.W.2d 660, 662-63 (1969). Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8526 - 2017-09-19
the last word. See Ekstrom v. State, 45 Wis.2d 218, 223-24, 172 N.W.2d 660, 662-63 (1969). Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8526 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Derrick L Waller
, a trial whose result is reliable.” See id. In other words, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10412 - 2017-09-20
, a trial whose result is reliable.” See id. In other words, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10412 - 2017-09-20