Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9021 - 9030 of 29429 for er.
Search results 9021 - 9030 of 29429 for er.
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred by considering the wishes of the first-degree assault victim, because the statute sets out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29983 - 2007-08-14
court erred by considering the wishes of the first-degree assault victim, because the statute sets out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29983 - 2007-08-14
State v. Jay A. Jansen
A. Jansen contends that the trial court erred in its analysis of his entrapment defense. Although the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8596 - 2005-03-31
A. Jansen contends that the trial court erred in its analysis of his entrapment defense. Although the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8596 - 2005-03-31
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
argues that the trial court erred in concluding that her action was barred under the doctrine of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12682 - 2005-03-31
argues that the trial court erred in concluding that her action was barred under the doctrine of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12682 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred by denying his request for a new attorney and that he had received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753851 - 2024-01-24
court erred by denying his request for a new attorney and that he had received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753851 - 2024-01-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 946.41(1). Peters first contends that the circuit erred when it held that Peters was the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32802 - 2008-05-27
. § 946.41(1). Peters first contends that the circuit erred when it held that Peters was the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32802 - 2008-05-27
State v. Henry Pocan
the court erred both when it discounted his expert’s evaluation and when it concluded the facts did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18852 - 2005-07-05
the court erred both when it discounted his expert’s evaluation and when it concluded the facts did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18852 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues that the trial court erred because it did not make a finding that the witness was available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30565 - 2014-09-15
argues that the trial court erred because it did not make a finding that the witness was available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30565 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the circuit court’s determination. Id., ¶¶16-17. Bransford first claims the circuit court erred because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141073 - 2017-09-21
for the circuit court’s determination. Id., ¶¶16-17. Bransford first claims the circuit court erred because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141073 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
construe Patterson’s appeal as arguing that the trial court erred in its application of WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38154 - 2014-09-15
construe Patterson’s appeal as arguing that the trial court erred in its application of WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38154 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for obstructing an officer, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 946.41(1). Peters first contends that the circuit erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32802 - 2014-09-15
for obstructing an officer, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 946.41(1). Peters first contends that the circuit erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32802 - 2014-09-15