Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9021 - 9030 of 24584 for extending.
Search results 9021 - 9030 of 24584 for extending.
State v. David W. Pender
. The trial court has broad discretion in instructing the jury, which extends to the choice of language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9739 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court has broad discretion in instructing the jury, which extends to the choice of language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9739 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to six years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision.[2] The no-merit report discusses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142936 - 2015-06-16
to six years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision.[2] The no-merit report discusses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142936 - 2015-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses in detail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729156 - 2023-11-15
of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses in detail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729156 - 2023-11-15
Dean Oschmann v. Secura Insurance
of the insured car by whatever means. No reasonable interpretation of that provision can extend coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15557 - 2005-03-31
of the insured car by whatever means. No reasonable interpretation of that provision can extend coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15557 - 2005-03-31
Robert E. Moss v. Mt. Morris Mutual Insurance Company
not extend to allowing removal of the furnace. They did, however, offer to allow removal if Mt. Morris paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7730 - 2005-03-31
not extend to allowing removal of the furnace. They did, however, offer to allow removal if Mt. Morris paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7730 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
years of initial confinement and nine years of extended supervision. Garcia filed a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136561 - 2015-03-09
years of initial confinement and nine years of extended supervision. Garcia filed a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136561 - 2015-03-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of fourteen years of initial confinement and fourteen years of extended supervision. Schoonover now
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264335 - 2020-06-17
of fourteen years of initial confinement and fourteen years of extended supervision. Schoonover now
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264335 - 2020-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court then imposed a sentence of ten years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93402 - 2014-09-15
. The court then imposed a sentence of ten years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93402 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
terms (five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision). The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484462 - 2022-02-16
terms (five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision). The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484462 - 2022-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision, consecutive to existing sentences. On the second count, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23
years of extended supervision, consecutive to existing sentences. On the second count, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23