Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9031 - 9040 of 76639 for search which.
Search results 9031 - 9040 of 76639 for search which.
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
in the record from which it could be inferred that he received the form. The conduct report was issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6556 - 2005-03-31
in the record from which it could be inferred that he received the form. The conduct report was issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6556 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not perform well on field sobriety tests. He was arrested and his vehicle was searched. After he was read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37712 - 2009-07-21
not perform well on field sobriety tests. He was arrested and his vehicle was searched. After he was read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37712 - 2009-07-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
obtained from his interaction with police, which he argued was an unlawful search in violation of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136999 - 2017-09-21
obtained from his interaction with police, which he argued was an unlawful search in violation of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136999 - 2017-09-21
State v. Janelle L.I.
the law, unless by searching the record, we can find reasons to support the court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15212 - 2005-03-31
the law, unless by searching the record, we can find reasons to support the court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15212 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added decisions in 2014AP2236 and 2015AP1055
; the method by which the case came to the Supreme Court: REVW = Petition for review, CERT = Certification
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190113 - 2017-09-21
; the method by which the case came to the Supreme Court: REVW = Petition for review, CERT = Certification
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190113 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on the other end of the line “confirmed” the checks’ validity. ¶9 Police had executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118318 - 2014-07-28
on the other end of the line “confirmed” the checks’ validity. ¶9 Police had executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118318 - 2014-07-28
State v. Alonzo R.
for birth expenses and blood tests amounted to $2,149, which was to be repaid at the rate of $5 per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14802 - 2005-03-31
for birth expenses and blood tests amounted to $2,149, which was to be repaid at the rate of $5 per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14802 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alonzo R.
that the pre-judgment assessments for birth expenses and blood tests amounted to $2,149, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14802 - 2017-09-21
that the pre-judgment assessments for birth expenses and blood tests amounted to $2,149, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14802 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alonzo R.
for birth expenses and blood tests amounted to $2,149, which was to be repaid at the rate of $5 per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15128 - 2005-03-31
for birth expenses and blood tests amounted to $2,149, which was to be repaid at the rate of $5 per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15128 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alonzo R.
that the pre-judgment assessments for birth expenses and blood tests amounted to $2,149, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15128 - 2017-09-21
that the pre-judgment assessments for birth expenses and blood tests amounted to $2,149, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15128 - 2017-09-21