Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9041 - 9050 of 90101 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
Search results 9041 - 9050 of 90101 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
Rule Order
to be relevant. (2) The denial of the use of videoconferencing technology is not appealable. 885.58 Use in civil
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32608 - 2008-04-30
to be relevant. (2) The denial of the use of videoconferencing technology is not appealable. 885.58 Use in civil
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32608 - 2008-04-30
State v. Harry Montey
of the circuit court for Dane County: mark a. frankel, Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich, Vergeront and Deininger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13694 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Dane County: mark a. frankel, Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich, Vergeront and Deininger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13694 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
under its civil service ordinance rules on Evenson’s behalf. The county reinstated Evenson, effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14
under its civil service ordinance rules on Evenson’s behalf. The county reinstated Evenson, effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14
CA Blank Order
District IV January 30, 2015 To: Hon. Dale T. Pasell Circuit Court Judge La Crosse County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134281 - 2015-01-29
District IV January 30, 2015 To: Hon. Dale T. Pasell Circuit Court Judge La Crosse County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134281 - 2015-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority, except
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356019 - 2021-04-14
. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority, except
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356019 - 2021-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980619 - 2025-07-10
, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980619 - 2025-07-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980619 - 2025-07-10
, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980619 - 2025-07-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Knaus (L. C. No. 2005CV369) Before Seidl, J.1 Summary disposition orders may not be cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295363 - 2020-10-14
. Knaus (L. C. No. 2005CV369) Before Seidl, J.1 Summary disposition orders may not be cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295363 - 2020-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Andrew M. Szatkowski (L. C. No. 2020CM929) Before Gill, J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891247 - 2024-12-17
. Andrew M. Szatkowski (L. C. No. 2020CM929) Before Gill, J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891247 - 2024-12-17
[PDF]
WI 31
: ORAL ARGUMENT: February 2, 2011 SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY: WASHINGTON
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64259 - 2014-09-15
: ORAL ARGUMENT: February 2, 2011 SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY: WASHINGTON
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64259 - 2014-09-15