Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9051 - 9060 of 59075 for quit claim deed.

Sara A. Tridle v. Grace G. Horn
. We do so because Midwest did not file a cross-claim against Horn, and therefore the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4703 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Carol J. Salsbury v. Michael R. Miller
Salsbury received from the other driver and his insurer. Salsbury settled her claims for $495,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12999 - 2017-09-21

State v. Donald J. Buford
denying his postconviction motion. Buford claims: (1) he did not knowingly waive his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] National Operating v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
by the doctrine of claim preclusion. We affirm. No. 99-1119 2 ¶2 In 1978, National borrowed money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15445 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Christopher J. Klahn v. Patricia Vajgrt
a small claims court judgment and $2,500 damages award to her neighbor and Lucky’s owner, Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26341 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
notes of his sentencing hearing to support his claim of transcript errors; (2) the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56888 - 2010-11-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by Attorney Chris Gramstrup (hereinafter, “postconviction counsel”), who raised three claims, none of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749277 - 2024-01-09

2007 WI APP 209
, 2004, served a notice of claim under Wis. Stat. § 893.80(1). The City did not respond. Coakley began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29960 - 2007-09-25

[PDF] Michael Green v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
their claims against Heritage Mutual Insurance Company (Heritage) seeking reimbursement from Heritage under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4493 - 2017-09-19

Miller Brewing Company v. Department of Industry
held that Becky Kozera's ("Kozera") claim under the Wisconsin Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA"),[2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16918 - 2005-03-31