Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9061 - 9070 of 29410 for er.
Search results 9061 - 9070 of 29410 for er.
[PDF]
NOTICE
, arguing the circuit court erred in concluding the officer had probable cause to stop him for operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63282 - 2014-09-15
, arguing the circuit court erred in concluding the officer had probable cause to stop him for operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63282 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
).2 Delgadillo contends that the trial court erred in dismissing his motion to suppress based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30087 - 2014-09-15
).2 Delgadillo contends that the trial court erred in dismissing his motion to suppress based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30087 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.’” Specifically, Schicker argues that the court erred because “she did not admit to stealing other items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101061 - 2013-08-20
.’” Specifically, Schicker argues that the court erred because “she did not admit to stealing other items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101061 - 2013-08-20
State v. Alan D. Hayden
court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the stop of his vehicle was not based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21003 - 2006-01-18
court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the stop of his vehicle was not based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21003 - 2006-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred in denying his post-disposition motion without holding an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483897 - 2022-02-15
that the trial court erred in denying his post-disposition motion without holding an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483897 - 2022-02-15
[PDF]
James W. Jeffords v. Pamela Scott (Jeffords)
for reconsideration asserting that the court erred because the decision did not (1) follow U.S. bankruptcy law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2307 - 2017-09-19
for reconsideration asserting that the court erred because the decision did not (1) follow U.S. bankruptcy law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2307 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (2001‑02).[2] Delgadillo contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30087 - 2007-08-27
, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (2001‑02).[2] Delgadillo contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30087 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues that the trial court erred because it did not make a finding that the witness was available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30565 - 2014-09-15
argues that the trial court erred because it did not make a finding that the witness was available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30565 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
on these doctrines, she does not otherwise discuss its ruling. Rather, Millerleile argues this court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78966 - 2012-03-05
on these doctrines, she does not otherwise discuss its ruling. Rather, Millerleile argues this court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78966 - 2012-03-05
State v. Ashanti D.
afterward; (2) whether the trial court erred when it denied his postconviction motion premised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10355 - 2005-03-31
afterward; (2) whether the trial court erred when it denied his postconviction motion premised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10355 - 2005-03-31