Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9061 - 9070 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 9061 - 9070 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years’ initial confinement plus ten years’ extended supervision, consecutive to any other sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254222 - 2020-02-19
years’ initial confinement plus ten years’ extended supervision, consecutive to any other sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254222 - 2020-02-19
[PDF]
State v. Joan Schmitz
of “contact” did not extend to just sitting next to Andrea N. in a courtroom. Andrea N. also testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16324 - 2017-09-21
of “contact” did not extend to just sitting next to Andrea N. in a courtroom. Andrea N. also testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16324 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and five years’ extended supervision. There is no arguable basis upon which Husbeck could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194323 - 2017-09-21
confinement and five years’ extended supervision. There is no arguable basis upon which Husbeck could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194323 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. Mallon subsequently filed a motion for postconviction relief, arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109066 - 2017-09-21
years of extended supervision. Mallon subsequently filed a motion for postconviction relief, arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109066 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
weapon. The court sentenced Hughes to twelve years of initial confinement and eight years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125431 - 2014-10-27
weapon. The court sentenced Hughes to twelve years of initial confinement and eight years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125431 - 2014-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an extended period of alienation, changing the family dynamics. Attorney Morales testified that she decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67019 - 2014-09-15
an extended period of alienation, changing the family dynamics. Attorney Morales testified that she decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67019 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to three and a half years of initial confinement and eighteen months of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132839 - 2015-01-12
to three and a half years of initial confinement and eighteen months of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132839 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Neu
that this exchange violated the Fencl holding that “the protections of the Fifth Amendment do extend to pre-Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16044 - 2017-09-21
that this exchange violated the Fencl holding that “the protections of the Fifth Amendment do extend to pre-Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16044 - 2017-09-21
State v. David D. Brown
’ extended supervision followed by five years’ probation. In his postconviction motion, Brown complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5045 - 2005-03-31
’ extended supervision followed by five years’ probation. In his postconviction motion, Brown complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5045 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by the fact that Strong had recently returned to the home after an extended period of alienation, changing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67019 - 2011-07-05
by the fact that Strong had recently returned to the home after an extended period of alienation, changing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67019 - 2011-07-05