Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9061 - 9070 of 26591 for marital settlement agreement/1000.
Search results 9061 - 9070 of 26591 for marital settlement agreement/1000.
State v. Frank Anastasi
. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02).[1] He claims that the State breached his plea agreement and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7441 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02).[1] He claims that the State breached his plea agreement and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7441 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to grounds for the termination; (3) whether the court properly accepted Mary’s agreement to revoke the hold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108018 - 2014-02-18
to grounds for the termination; (3) whether the court properly accepted Mary’s agreement to revoke the hold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108018 - 2014-02-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In 1998, MCTC’s corporate predecessor signed a lease agreement with Tyler Anderson’s parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974811 - 2025-06-26
. In 1998, MCTC’s corporate predecessor signed a lease agreement with Tyler Anderson’s parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974811 - 2025-06-26
State v. Thomas A. Greve
to the substituted judge, an agreement for the transfer must be signed by the defendant or the defendant’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3995 - 2005-03-31
to the substituted judge, an agreement for the transfer must be signed by the defendant or the defendant’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pleas to three charges in two separate cases, pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231868 - 2019-01-08
pleas to three charges in two separate cases, pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231868 - 2019-01-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State breached the plea agreement during the sentencing hearing by arguing for a harsher sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73090 - 2014-09-15
the State breached the plea agreement during the sentencing hearing by arguing for a harsher sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73090 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2013AP264 2 performance. Matejka alleged that there was an enforceable land purchase agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103339 - 2017-09-21
No. 2013AP264 2 performance. Matejka alleged that there was an enforceable land purchase agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103339 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea agreement during the sentencing hearing by arguing for a harsher sentence than it agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73090 - 2011-10-31
the plea agreement during the sentencing hearing by arguing for a harsher sentence than it agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73090 - 2011-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was an enforceable land purchase agreement. Both parties moved for summary judgment. ¶2 Matejka argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103339 - 2013-10-23
that there was an enforceable land purchase agreement. Both parties moved for summary judgment. ¶2 Matejka argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103339 - 2013-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
or sentencing modification. The plea agreement in this case required the State to “cap” its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06
or sentencing modification. The plea agreement in this case required the State to “cap” its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06